[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1112180059080.21784@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:03:06 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Put braces around potentially empty 'if' body in
handle_pte_fault()
If one builds the kernel with -Wempty-body one gets this warning:
mm/memory.c:3432:46: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘if’ statement [-Wempty-body]
due to the fact that 'flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault' is a macro that
can sometimes be defined to nothing.
I suggest we heed gcc's advice and put a pair of braces on that if.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
---
mm/memory.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 829d437..9cf1b48 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3428,9 +3428,9 @@ int handle_pte_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
* This still avoids useless tlb flushes for .text page faults
* with threads.
*/
- if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE)
+ if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault(vma, address);
+ }
}
unlock:
pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
--
1.7.8
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists