[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1324167535.3323.63.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:18:55 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Put braces around potentially empty 'if' body in
handle_pte_fault()
Le dimanche 18 décembre 2011 à 01:03 +0100, Jesper Juhl a écrit :
> If one builds the kernel with -Wempty-body one gets this warning:
>
> mm/memory.c:3432:46: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘if’ statement [-Wempty-body]
>
> due to the fact that 'flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault' is a macro that
> can sometimes be defined to nothing.
>
> I suggest we heed gcc's advice and put a pair of braces on that if.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 829d437..9cf1b48 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3428,9 +3428,9 @@ int handle_pte_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
> * This still avoids useless tlb flushes for .text page faults
> * with threads.
> */
> - if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE)
> + if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
> flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault(vma, address);
> + }
> }
> unlock:
> pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
> --
> 1.7.8
>
Thats should be fixed in the reverse way :
#define flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault(vma, address) do { } while (0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists