[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878vm8btcp.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:39:58 +0530
From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Gang scheduling in CFS
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:50:31 +0200, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 12/19/2011 02:06 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> > The above ebizzy result is from a non-PLE machine, will yield_to come
> > in to picture here?
>
> No. I have a soft-PLE patchset but I don't think it's any good.
>
I had tried your soft-PLE patchset some time back, gang sched was doing
pretty good compared to soft-PLE.
Regards,
Nikunj
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists