[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EEF566B.6080703@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:21:15 +0100
From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Barry Song <baohua.song@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] irq: check domain hwirq range for DT translate
On 12/19/2011 3:23 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> Benoit,
>
> On 12/19/2011 06:41 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> While trying your series to take advantage of the generic-irq domain
>> support for OMAP3 INTC, I realized that the following patch is breaking
>> drivers that are using irq_domain_add_simple.
>>
>> The point is that irq_domain_add_simple does not populate hwirq_base or
>> nr_irq, so that test will always fail if the domain is created by the
>> irq_domain_add_simple API.
>>
>> Adding an extra parameter to provide the nr_irq should fix that.
>>
>> The long term fix should be to use the generic-irq for such driver, but
>> this is not the same effort, so it might worth fixing that API for the
>> moment.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Benoit
>>
>> On 12/14/2011 4:28 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> From: Rob Herring<rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>>
>>> A DT node may have more than 1 domain associated with it, so make sure
>>> the hwirq number is within range when doing DT translation.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring<rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@...utronix.de>
>>> ---
>>> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
>>> index 200ce83..ae6441e 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
>>> @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ int irq_domain_simple_dt_translate(struct
>>> irq_domain *d,
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> if (intsize< 1)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> + if ((intspec[0]< d->hwirq_base) ||
>>> + (intspec[0]>= d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq))
>
> I think this should work:
>
> if (d->nr_irq&& ((intspec[0]< d->hwirq_base) ||
> (intspec[0]>= d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq)))
Yes, indeed. It is even simpler that fixing the API.
I can now repost the OMAP3/4 series based on this series.
Thanks,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists