[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1324376248.24621.26.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:17:28 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: avagin@...il.com
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Andrew Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...e.hu, asharma@...com, devel@...nvz.org,
dsahern@...il.com, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] perf: add ability to record event period
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 12:07 +0400, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> Look at the comment below. In it I try describe why we need this
> functionality.
Its not about comments, a patch has to have a Changelog that covers the
why and what. If it doesn't the patch won't go anywhere. Also, its not
the maintainers job to reconstruct such a changelog from an email
discussion.
So write up a proper changelog and resubmit the patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists