[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EF2352C.3060102@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:36:12 +0100
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@...il.com>,
Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] coupled cpuidle state support
>>
>> .. or it enters WFI, and a physical device sends it an interrupt,
>> at which point it exits.
>
> None of the cpus will return to the idle loop until all cpus have
> decremented the ready counter back to 0, so they can't wrap around
> again.
yikes, so you IPI all the cpus on the first exit.
that must burn power ;-(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists