[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1324432958-20414-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:02:38 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>,
Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2 v2] cgroup: Drop task_lock(parent) on cgroup_fork()
We don't need to hold the parent task_lock() on the
parent in cgroup_fork() because we are already synchronized
against the two places that may change the parent css_set
concurrently:
- cgroup_exit(), but the parent obviously can't exit concurrently
- cgroup migration: we are synchronized against threadgroup_lock()
So we can safely remove the task_lock() there.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>
Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>
---
kernel/cgroup.c | 10 +++++++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 24f6d6f..1999f60 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -4556,7 +4556,7 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_cgroupstats_operations = {
*
* A pointer to the shared css_set was automatically copied in
* fork.c by dup_task_struct(). However, we ignore that copy, since
- * it was not made under the protection of RCU or cgroup_mutex, so
+ * it was not made under the protection of threadgroup_change_begin(), so
* might no longer be a valid cgroup pointer. cgroup_attach_task() might
* have already changed current->cgroups, allowing the previously
* referenced cgroup group to be removed and freed.
@@ -4566,10 +4566,14 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_cgroupstats_operations = {
*/
void cgroup_fork(struct task_struct *child)
{
- task_lock(current);
+ /*
+ * We don't need to task_lock() current because current->cgroups
+ * can't be changed concurrently here. The parent obviously hasn't
+ * exited and called cgroup_exit(), and we are synchronized against
+ * cgroup migration through threadgroup_change_begin().
+ */
child->cgroups = current->cgroups;
get_css_set(child->cgroups);
- task_unlock(current);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&child->cg_list);
}
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists