[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1324601873-20773-2-git-send-email-msb@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:57:52 -0800
From: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] cgroup: remove double-checking locking from attach_task_by_pid
By reading group_leader after taking the threadgroup_lock, we can
avoid the double-check locking. This removes the return of
-EAGAIN so we can cleanup cgroup_procs_write at the same time.
The suggestion was made here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/22/371
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>
---
kernel/cgroup.c | 40 ++++++----------------------------------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 032139d..a5f7d1b 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2234,9 +2234,6 @@ static int attach_task_by_pid(struct cgroup *cgrp, u64 pid, bool threadgroup)
ret= -ESRCH;
goto out_unlock_cgroup;
}
- /* we check later for a group_leader race with de_thread */
- if (threadgroup)
- tsk = tsk->group_leader;
/*
* even if we're attaching all tasks in the thread group, we
* only need to check permissions on one of them.
@@ -2252,33 +2249,17 @@ static int attach_task_by_pid(struct cgroup *cgrp, u64 pid, bool threadgroup)
get_task_struct(tsk);
rcu_read_unlock();
} else {
- if (threadgroup)
- tsk = current->group_leader;
- else
- tsk = current;
+ tsk = current;
get_task_struct(tsk);
}
threadgroup_lock(tsk);
-
- if (threadgroup) {
- if (!thread_group_leader(tsk)) {
- /*
- * a race with de_thread from another thread's exec()
- * may strip us of our leadership, if this happens,
- * there is no choice but to throw this task away and
- * try again (from cgroup_procs_write); this is
- * "double-double-toil-and-trouble-check locking".
- */
- ret = -EAGAIN;
- goto out_unlock_threadgroup;
- }
- ret = cgroup_attach_proc(cgrp, tsk);
- } else
+ if (threadgroup)
+ ret = cgroup_attach_proc(cgrp, tsk->group_leader);
+ else
ret = cgroup_attach_task(cgrp, tsk);
-
-out_unlock_threadgroup:
threadgroup_unlock(tsk);
+
put_task_struct(tsk);
out_unlock_cgroup:
cgroup_unlock();
@@ -2292,16 +2273,7 @@ static int cgroup_tasks_write(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft, u64 pid)
static int cgroup_procs_write(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft, u64 tgid)
{
- int ret;
- do {
- /*
- * attach_proc fails with -EAGAIN if threadgroup leadership
- * changes in the middle of the operation, in which case we need
- * to find the task_struct for the new leader and start over.
- */
- ret = attach_task_by_pid(cgrp, tgid, true);
- } while (ret == -EAGAIN);
- return ret;
+ return attach_task_by_pid(cgrp, tgid, true);
}
/**
--
1.7.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists