[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111223133956.GC26157@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:39:56 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
pjt@...gle.com, devel@...nvz.org, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move get_idle_time , get_iowait_time to sched/core.c
On Fri 23-12-11 14:08:09, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 01:31 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> >In commit a25cac5198 we changed the way we calculate idle and iowait
> >for /proc/stat displaying purposes. However, this same information
> >is also displayed in /proc/uptime. These values can now be inconsistent.
> >
> >So I propose we draw both idle values from the same place. In theory,
> >we only need to do it for get_idle_time(). get_iowait_time() is moved
> >as well for consistency only.
> >
> >I moved the functions to sched/core.c so it can live among its other
> >friends like nr_iowait(), etc.
> >
>
> You guys have any opinions on this ?
> I see that Michal got another fix for this in stat.c already, so I'd
> have to respin this one anyway. Just let me know if this is wanted
The last follow up fix is in Andrew's tree at the moment: procfs: do not
confuse jiffies with cputime64_t.
I don't mind moving those functions outside stat.c if it is reused.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists