lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:29:48 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <>
To:	<>
Cc:	<>, <>
Subject: irqsafe_cpu_...() 64-bit operations on 32-bit platform


you introduced these for 2.6.33, but I wonder about their completeness
in the current state: On ix86, I can add, sub, xor, etc a 64-bit variable
this way (through the generic implementation), but there's no way to
read or write such a variable. While not documented explicitly, it seems
like the assumption is that this_cpu_{read,write}() can be used for this
purpose, but that's clearly wrong.

Along the same lines, Ingo, x86 has set_64bit() but no get_64bit()
(and no [gs]et_64bit_local()). Is that really intentional?

Thanks for your thoughts on this,

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists