[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvzGWddcSMK58-+OozyQHDNFd+z0-XSNiC47r+VpmXqnyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:26:15 +0100
From: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To: Gaurav Saxena <grvsaxena419@...il.com>
Cc: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@...oo.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Intercepting system calls
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Gaurav Saxena <grvsaxena419@...il.com> wrote:
> Hello Richard
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:46 PM, richard -rw- weinberger
> <richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Gaurav Saxena <grvsaxena419@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Ok I have seen details of KPROBES, I think it will suit to my
>>> requirements, I just wanted to know a few things,
>>> Can I use probes to prevent unlink of certain files? Also is
>>> CONFIG_KPROBES set to "y" on linux kernels available with distros like
>>> ubuntu?
>>
>> Kprobes allow you to instrument the kernel.
>> AFAIK it enabled by most distros.
> Can I use probes to return immediately ie. without execution of
> original system call. For example I put a entry probe on unlink and
> then on the probe return value unlink code is executed or not. Is that
> possible ?
> Also can I call a userspace function from kernel code? Would that be insecure ?
Using Kprobes you can do nearly anything.
But I would be surprised if you find a acceptable and sane solution.
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists