[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAN1soZyatf2u4fVk-=U_Sz4wcVwP7qFaiZK4CR3rosbXeQObvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:04:07 +0800
From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>
To: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
Cc: Haojian Zhuang <hzhuang1@...vell.com>,
Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>,
"linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: pxa: fix error handling in pxa2xx_drv_pcmcia_probe
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Haojian Zhuang <hzhuang1@...vell.com> wrote:
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Eric Miao [eric.y.miao@...il.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 5:11 PM
>> To: Axel Lin
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Haojian Zhuang; Russell King; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: pxa: fix error handling in pxa2xx_drv_pcmcia_probe
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com> wrote:
>>> If pxa2xx_drv_pcmcia_add_one fails, it will go to err1 error path.
>>> Add a missing clk_put in the error path.
>>>
>>> Checking the ret value after the for loop is redundant, it is always false.
>>> Thus remove the redundant checking.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_base.c | 12 +++---------
>>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_base.c b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_base.c
>>> index a87e272..64d433e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_base.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_base.c
>>> @@ -328,21 +328,15 @@ static int pxa2xx_drv_pcmcia_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>>> goto err1;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (ret) {
>>> - while (--i >= 0)
>>> - soc_pcmcia_remove_one(&sinfo->skt[i]);
>>> - kfree(sinfo);
>>> - clk_put(clk);
>>> - } else {
>>> - pxa2xx_configure_sockets(&dev->dev);
>>> - dev_set_drvdata(&dev->dev, sinfo);
>>> - }
>>> + pxa2xx_configure_sockets(&dev->dev);
>>> + dev_set_drvdata(&dev->dev, sinfo);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> err1:
>>> while (--i >= 0)
>>> soc_pcmcia_remove_one(&sinfo->skt[i]);
>>> + clk_put(clk);
>>> kfree(sinfo);
>>> err0:
>>> return ret;
>>> --
>>> 1.7.5.4
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Wait a minute.
>>
>> The original code will check whether pxa2xx_drv_pcmcia_add_one() successful. If it fails, we'll remove all devices that we registered.
>>
>> But Axel removed these code. Why?
>
> If it fails, it will jump to err1 anyway. The check there is redundant.
>
Applied
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists