[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111228004102.GK17712@google.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:41:02 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, avi@...hat.com,
nate@...nel.net, cl@...ux-foundation.org, oleg@...hat.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] block, mempool, percpu: implement percpu mempool
and fix blkcg percpu alloc deadlock
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 09:14:02AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > This is essentially more specialized form of the mempool approach. It
> > doesn't seem any simpler to me while being less generic. I don't see
> > what the upside would be.
>
> Hm, but this never causes -ENOMEM error, at all.
Ooh, I missed the part it falls back to the global counter if percpu
counters aren't allocated yet. Yeah, this is an interesting approach.
I'll think more about it.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists