linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmaengine/dw_dmac: Add support for device_prep_dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1325595816.1540.65.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Date:	Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:36 +0530
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@...com>,
	"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Vipul Kumar SAMAR <vipulkumar.samar@...com>,
	Bhavna YADAV <bhavna.yadav@...com>,
	Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@...com>,
	Armando VISCONTI <armando.visconti@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vipin KUMAR <vipin.kumar@...com>,
	Shiraz HASHIM <shiraz.hashim@...com>,
	Amit VIRDI <Amit.VIRDI@...com>,
	Mirko GARDI <mirko.gardi@...com>,
	Deepak SIKRI <deepak.sikri@...com>,
	"dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Rajeev KUMAR <rajeev-dlh.kumar@...com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Vincenzo FRASCINO <Vincenzo.FRASCINO@...com>,
	Viresh KUMAR <viresh.kumar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine/dw_dmac: Add support for device_prep_dma_sg

On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 09:40 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 04:55:35PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 16:50 +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > > On 12/23/2011 9:28 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 14:17 +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > > >> Memory to memory copy with scatter gather option has been implemented in
> > > >> this patch. Driver can manage even if number of nodes in src and dst
> > > >> list is different.
> > > > The logic looks okay, but it would be great if we could split this
> > > > prepare here.
> > > > Possibly later when we have multiple such cases we can create templates
> > > > for parsing the non linear sg list and create linear lists from it.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Ok. So you suggest to have one patch with a function to align sglist
> > > w.r.t length, and to implement this dwc_prep_dma_sg with aligned list only.
> > IMO that would be a much better approach
> > > 
> > > Caller of dwc_prep_dma_sg function will also call something like
> > > align_sg_list(unaligned_dsgl, unaligned ssgl, aligned dsgl,aligned ssgl);
> > and this one can be common code in dmaengine
> 
> Wait a moment.  This looks like a disaster waiting to happen.  The DMA
> engine code doesn't really handle the DMA API properly as it is - and
> that has lead to at least one recent oops report (and it still remains
> unresolved.)
> 
> The DMA API has the idea of buffer ownership: a buffer is either owned by
> the CPU, or the DMA device.  Only its owner may explicitly access the
> buffer.
> 
> Before a buffer can be used for DMA, it must be mapped to the DMA device
> (using dma_map_sg() or dma_map_single().)  Once this call returns, the
> mapping is setup and the CPU must not explicitly access the buffer until
> the buffer is unmapped via dma_unmap_sg() or dma_unmap_single().
> 
> With the DMA engine API, the caller is responsible for mapping the buffer.
> 
> This means that if you want to ensure that the buffer is correctly aligned,
> you must check the alignments _before_ mapping the buffer, and do any
> appropriate copies at this stage.
> 
> So, it must be:
> 	- align_sg_list
> 	- map aligned lists
> 	- prep_dma_sg
Yes, that is something I had in mind as well.
For slave-dma as we documented, the peripheral driver needs to take care
of mapping hence it should do above as you suggested and not the one
below.
My suggestion was to have a generic alignment routine for sg list (which
may be used by other drivers as well) in some common place.
> and not
> 	- map aligned lists
> 	- align_sg_list
> 	- prep_dma_sg
> because then you're violating the DMA API by having the CPU access an
> already mapped buffer - and that will lead to data corruption.
> 
> Finally, consider this: you have two scatterlists which ask you to copy
> between two buffers.  The first is offset by one byte from a 32-bit word
> boundary.  The second is offset by two bytes from a 32-bit word
> boundary.  Your DMA engine can only perform naturally aligned 32-bit
> transfers for both the source and destination.  How do you see this
> situation being dealt with?
in this case, i don't think dmaengine can perform the task.
it should check for required alignments in the respective prepare
function, and return error if it cant support it.
Nevertheless, all prepare functions should be checking for word
alignment of source and destination...

-- 
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/