[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <01bb01ccca79$ae1ad770$0a508650$%kim@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:42:04 +0900
From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
To: 'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: 'Stephen Rothwell' <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
'Greg KH' <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the s5p tree
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com> wrote:
> >
> > OK, I see. Firstly, I will rebase my for-next as per your suggestion. As
> you
> > know, I just wanted to avoid known conflicts with driver-core tree.
>
> Please, in general you should *not* rebase on top of other peoples
OK, I will remember. And as a note, I didn't 'rebase' on top of other tree
just 'merge' in the case of having dependency with others and of course if
that is _really_ required. But we know, if the merged tree is rebased,
something wrong will happen :(
> trees either. What's the conflict and why do you need that other tree
> in the first place?
>
The driver-core tree changed usage(?) of sysdev_class and touched some files
and the changed files have been merged into one file for some reason without
driver-core's changes in samsung tree. So I just wanted to avoid the
conflicts. Linus, how should/can I do in this case?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists