[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120104090702.GA28052@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 09:07:02 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:18:30PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Kukjin,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the s5p tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/system-reset.h between commit
> 281c8724c10c ("ARM: restart: Temporary #error to persuade platform
> maintainers to take the restart changes seriously") from the arm tree and
> commit 08c6fc52956c ("ARM: restart: EXYNOS: use new restart hook") from
> the s5p tree.
>
> The arm tree patch seems to have had the desired affect so I used the s5p
> tree version.
Err, what are the Samsung people playing at, merging the patches that
they've sent me for merging into their own tree?
This is a recipe for breakage, especially as the exynos patch depends
on previous patches in my tree _and_ patches in my tree depend on that
patch as well.
Well, we'll see what we end up with when you do the next linux-next,
as by then my public tree should be updated with yesterdays work by
then.
I've a feeling that this coming merge window is going to be a horrible
mess.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists