[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4F04273E020000780006A502@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:17:34 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad@...nok.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"dmitry.torokhov@...il.com" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"FlorianSchandinat@....de" <FlorianSchandinat@....de>,
"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"Ben Hutchings" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] Xen: consolidate and simplify struct
xenbus_driver instantiation
>>> On 03.01.12 at 21:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 08:38:21PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 14:44 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 11:57 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> > > On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 11:51 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > > > >>> On 22.12.11 at 10:57, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com> wrote:
>> > > > > On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:08 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > > > >> The 'name', 'owner', and 'mod_name' members are redundant with the
>> > > > >> identically named fields in the 'driver' sub-structure. Rather than
>> > > > >> switching each instance to specify these fields explicitly, introduce
>> > > > >> a macro to simplify this.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Eliminate further redundancy by allowing the drvname argument to
>> > > > >> DEFINE_XENBUS_DRIVER() to be blank (in which case the first entry from
>> > > > >> the ID table will be used for .driver.name).
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Any reason not to always use DRV_NAME here (which is generally a bit
>> > > > > more specific e.g. "xen-foofront" rather than "foo") and rely on the id
>> > > > > table for the shorter names used in xenstore?
>> > > >
>> > > > That would imply that DRV_NAME is always defined, but I don't
>> > > > see this being the case.
>> > >
>> > > My mistake, I thought it was a Kbuild thing.
>> >
>> > You're maybe thinking of KBUILD_MODNAME.
>>
>> Yes, I think I was.
>
> Ian, are you OK with this patch? I think Jan needs to repost once more with
> the
> "pciback" -> DRV_NAME change and then it is OK?
But that is what v2 was about (which is this thread).
Jan
> I've tested it with all backends, except the pciback one, and I see no
> regressions
> with 'xl' or 'xm' toolstack.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists