linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] debugfs: add missing #ifdef HAS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Jan 2012 00:48:23 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] debugfs: add missing #ifdef HAS_IOMEM

On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 04:44:52PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 03:08:28PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > "debugfs: add tools to printk 32-bit registers" adds new functions which rely
> > on IOMEM functionality which is not present on all architectures and therefore
> > result in compile errors:
> > 
> > fs/debugfs/file.c: In function 'debugfs_print_regs32':
> > fs/debugfs/file.c:561:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'readl' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 
> Who does not have readl()?  Surely there should be a .h file we are just
> missing to include?

s390, uml, etc.  What the hell is that kind of stuff doing in fs/*/*, anyway?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/