[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1325690398.2758.10.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:19:58 -0600
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: "Nandigama, Nagalakshmi" <Nagalakshmi.Nandigama@....com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Moore, Eric" <Eric.Moore@....com>
Subject: RE: [50/75] mpt2sas crashes on shutdown
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 14:23 +0530, Nandigama, Nagalakshmi wrote:
> Greg,
> As a fix to this issue, I posted the patch "[PATCH] mpt2sas: Remove
> msix_table_backup which is required only for preproduction boards".
> The patch in this mail will not address the complete issue.
>
> Please revert back this patch and add the patch "[PATCH] mpt2sas:
> Remove msix_table_backup which is required only for preproduction
> boards" to the stable kernels 3.0 and 3.1.
So the problem is that you still haven't actually manage to produce a
patch for the problem in the form required by the stable tree as listed
in
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
If you can't follow the guide, perhaps an example would work, so as a
one time thing, I'll show you what such a patch should look like
according to the rules of the stable kernel in reply to this email
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists