[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201201042327.33739.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 23:27:33 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, alan@...ux.intel.com,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: relocate remaining serial drivers from tty/ to tty/serial/
On Wednesday 04 January 2012, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > My thinking was that having a drivers/tty/serial dir and then
> > not having all the serial drivers in that dir violated the
> > principle of least surprise. Is there a reason why the dir should
> > be the exclusive domain of drivers with a dependency on SERIAL_CORE?
>
> Because that is what the directory is for? :)
>
> We have other "serial" like drivers all over the kernel, this was for
> the SERIAL_CORE drivers only at the moment.
My initial plan when moving some files to drivers/tty was to have a separate
directory for the non-SERIAL_CORE serial drivers next to drivers/tty/serial.
I would still prefer this solution, but I think we never agreed on a good
name for that directory. IIRC, I had suggested drivers/tty/legacy believing
that SERIAL_CORE was the modern way to implement a serial driver, but that
turned out not to be true and at lease one of these (bfin_jtag) is not
a legacy driver in practice.
Maybe drivers/tty/hw? I think that one has been suggested before, too.
I don't remember any argument against it and I think it would be nice
to separate the core implementation from actual device drivers.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists