[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1325762522.3635.23.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:22:02 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: efi: refactor efi_init() a bit
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 09:11 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Break out some of the init steps into helper functions.
>
> No code changes at all, identical execution flow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
Makes sense. I've got one tiny comment below, but other than that feel
free to add,
Acked-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
> if (memmap.desc_size != sizeof(efi_memory_desc_t))
> - printk(KERN_WARNING
> - "Kernel-defined memdesc doesn't match the one from EFI!\n");
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Kernel-defined memdesc doesn't match the "
> + "one from EFI!\n");
This sort of thing is generally discouraged because splitting a printk
string across more than one line makes it harder to grep for. I'm not
sure this hunk is an improvement.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists