lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:08:09 +0900
From:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
To:	'Stephen Rothwell' <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	'Greg KH' <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	'Nicolas Pitre' <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	'Russell King' <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	'Kay Sievers' <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: RE: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the arm tree

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/common.c between commit 109ac862f737 ("ARM:
> mach-s5pc100: use standard arch_idle()") from the arm tree and commit
> 4a858cfc9af8 ("arm: convert sysdev_class to a regular subsystem") from
> the driver-core tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/common.c
> index 4659fb9,af52c09..0000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/common.c
> @@@ -194,27 -154,17 +195,27 @@@ static struct device s5pc100_dev =
> 
>   static int __init s5pc100_core_init(void)
>   {
> - 	return sysdev_class_register(&s5pc100_sysclass);
> + 	return subsys_system_register(&s5pc100_subsys, NULL);
>   }
>  -
>   core_initcall(s5pc100_core_init);
> 
>   int __init s5pc100_init(void)
>   {
>   	printk(KERN_INFO "S5PC100: Initializing architecture\n");
> - 	return sysdev_register(&s5pc100_sysdev);
> ++	return device_register(&s5pc100_sys);

Hi Greg,

Should be 'return device_register(&s5pc100_dev);'?

Greg,
Following should be fixed in your driver-core/driver-core-next.
(I informed that but maybe you missed)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/pm.c
index 4b948ec..fda5385 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c2410/pm.c
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ arch_initcall(s3c2410_pm_drvinit);
 
 static struct subsys_interface s3c2410a_pm_interface = {
 	.name		= "s3c2410a_pm",
-	subsys		= &s3c2410a_subsys,
+	.subsys		= &s3c2410a_subsys,
 	.add_dev	= s3c2410_pm_add,
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c2412/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c2412/pm.c
index fd7210d..d1adfa6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c2412/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c2412/pm.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static struct subsys_interface s3c2412_pm_interface = {
 
 static __init int s3c2412_pm_init(void)
 {
-	return subsys_interface_register_register(&s3c2412_pm_interface);
+	return subsys_interface_register(&s3c2412_pm_interface);
 }
 
 arch_initcall(s3c2412_pm_init);
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c2440/s3c2442.c
b/arch/arm/mach-s3c2440/s3c2442.c
index 9ab15cd..8004e04 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c2440/s3c2442.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c2440/s3c2442.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static int s3c2442_clk_add(struct device *dev)
 static struct subsys_interface s3c2442_clk_interface = {
 	.name		= "s3c2442_clk",
 	.subsys		= &s3c2442_subsys,
-	.add_dev	 s3c2442_clk_add,
+	.add_dev	= s3c2442_clk_add,
 };
 
 static __init int s3c2442_clk_init(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/cpu.c
index 8b02990..74387a1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/cpu.c
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ struct bus_type s5p64x0_subsys = {
 	.dev_name	= "s5p64x0-core",
 };
 
-static struct device s5p64x0_subsys = {
+static struct device s5p64x0_dev = {
 	.bus	= &s5p64x0_subsys,
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/cpu.c
index af52c09..330a10b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/cpu.c
@@ -166,5 +166,5 @@ int __init s5pc100_init(void)
 	/* set idle function */
 	pm_idle = s5pc100_idle;
 
-	return device_register(&s5pc100_sys);
+	return device_register(&s5pc100_dev);
 }


Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--j
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ