linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the arm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120106192002.GA24244@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Jan 2012 11:20:02 -0800
From:	'Greg KH' <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Cc:	'Stephen Rothwell' <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	'Nicolas Pitre' <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	'Russell King' <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	'Kay Sievers' <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the arm
 tree

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 04:08:09PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/common.c between commit 109ac862f737 ("ARM:
> > mach-s5pc100: use standard arch_idle()") from the arm tree and commit
> > 4a858cfc9af8 ("arm: convert sysdev_class to a regular subsystem") from
> > the driver-core tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> > 
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
> > 
> > diff --cc arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/common.c
> > index 4659fb9,af52c09..0000000
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/common.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/common.c
> > @@@ -194,27 -154,17 +195,27 @@@ static struct device s5pc100_dev =
> > 
> >   static int __init s5pc100_core_init(void)
> >   {
> > - 	return sysdev_class_register(&s5pc100_sysclass);
> > + 	return subsys_system_register(&s5pc100_subsys, NULL);
> >   }
> >  -
> >   core_initcall(s5pc100_core_init);
> > 
> >   int __init s5pc100_init(void)
> >   {
> >   	printk(KERN_INFO "S5PC100: Initializing architecture\n");
> > - 	return sysdev_register(&s5pc100_sysdev);
> > ++	return device_register(&s5pc100_sys);
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Should be 'return device_register(&s5pc100_dev);'?
> 
> Greg,
> Following should be fixed in your driver-core/driver-core-next.
> (I informed that but maybe you missed)

Sorry, I missed this patch.  I'll apply it and take the above merge fix
as well.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/