linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86: initial support for sta2x11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120107082212.GA18254@mail.gnudd.com>
Date:	Sat, 7 Jan 2012 09:22:12 +0100
From:	Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>
To:	joe@...ches.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86: initial support for sta2x11

> trivia:

Thanks.

> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt

Ok.

> typo: s/subordindate/subordinate/

argh!

> It's probably not necessary to prefix with "sta2x11: "

fine.

> 
>> +			 size);
>> +		if (swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(size))
>> +			dev_emerg(&pdev->dev, "%s: init swiotlb(%i) failed\n",
>> +				  __func__, size);
> 
> or __func__

I don't understand. No size? Or you typoed and meant pr_fmt defined above?

>> +	uint32_t v[2]; /* used as a string... */
> 
> less than pretty.

Sure. But it's informative. Do you prefer a union? I don't want to
do be/le stuff as it's irrelevant. But I can't read 1 byte at a time
nor use a pointer there.

thanks, will resend

/alessandro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/