[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOtvUMddvPVQTaUQAmGOgx9Wz18ewVWG5nRouYaDuFWe13pX4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 18:25:24 +0200
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/9] arm: avoid using on_each_cpu hard coded ret value
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
<SNIP>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
>> index 5bb91bf..6e9acb7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
>> @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static int __init
>> cpu_pmu_reset(void)
>> {
>> if (cpu_pmu && cpu_pmu->reset)
>> - return on_each_cpu(cpu_pmu->reset, NULL, 1);
>> + on_each_cpu(cpu_pmu->reset, NULL, 1);
>
> There's not much to review here...
Oh, I've introduced fatal bugs with less... :-)
Thanks for the review.
Gilad
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker
gilad@...yossef.com
Israel Cell: +972-52-8260388
US Cell: +1-973-8260388
http://benyossef.com
"Unfortunately, cache misses are an equal opportunity pain provider."
-- Mike Galbraith, LKML
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists