[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120110055856.GA23741@linux-youquan.bj.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:58:56 -0500
From: Youquan Song <youquan.song@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Youquan Song <youquan.song@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
len.brown@...el.com, anhua.xu@...el.com, chaohong.guo@...el.com,
Youquan Song <youquan.song@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,sched: Fix sched_smt_power_savings totally broken
> Note, this has the hard-coded assumption you only have 2 threads per
> core, which while true for intel, isn't true in general. I think you
> meant to write *= group->group_weight or somesuch.
>
> Also, you forgot to limit this to the SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER domain, you're
> now doubling the capacity for all domains.
>
> Furthermore, have a look at the SD_PREFER_SIBLING logic and make sure
> you're not fighting that.
>
Thanks Peter! Here is the patch.
-Youquan
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a4d2b7a..4ada3e7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3923,6 +3923,10 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct
sched_domain *sd,
SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
if (!sgs->group_capacity)
sgs->group_capacity = fix_small_capacity(sd, group);
+
+ if (sched_smt_power_savings && !(sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER))
+ sgs->group_capacity = group->group_weight;
+
sgs->group_weight = group->group_weight;
if (sgs->group_capacity > sgs->sum_nr_running)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists