linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 9 (sound/soc vs. drivers/misc)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F0B54A0.20905@xenotime.net>
Date:	Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:57:04 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 9 (sound/soc vs. drivers/misc)

On 01/08/2012 10:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20120106:
> 
> This tree is still broken for sparc64 defconfig (at least).

AFAICT, all builds (on X86_32 or X86_64) have this kconfig warning:

drivers/misc/Kconfig:212:error: recursive dependency detected!
drivers/misc/Kconfig:212:	symbol ATMEL_SSC is selected by SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC
sound/soc/atmel/Kconfig:9:	symbol SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC is selected by SND_AT91_SOC_SAM9G20_WM8731
sound/soc/atmel/Kconfig:18:	symbol SND_AT91_SOC_SAM9G20_WM8731 depends on ATMEL_SSC

-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/