[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120109200734.GB30766@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 20:07:34 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: dd diasemi <dd.diasemi@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: drivers/regulator/core.c: Fixes mapping inside
regulator_mode_to_status() and makes it returning -EINVAL on
invalid input.
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:20:50PM +0000, dd diasemi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Mark Brown
> >> default:
> >> - return 0;
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> > This behaviour is deliberate.
> For this moment, the only usage is in one file in
> wm831x_aldo_get_status() and wm831x_gp_ldo_get_status():
> ret = wm831x_aldo_get_mode(rdev);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> else
> return regulator_mode_to_status(ret);
> The usage mistreats the signed value 'ret' as wm831x_aldo_get_mode()
> always returns 0 on communication error. It effects in response as if
> the regulator was off.
> If that behaviour is deliberate, I would suggest to make it explicit:
> default:
> - return 0;
> + return REGULATOR_STATUS_OFF;
That's not the deliberate behaviour, the deliberate behaviour is to
return no mode if we didn't find one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists