[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJd=RBAMn0Zi49iukLfV1S3je08OCqFv3nu=CZG1WTNyom7nig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:14:52 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: no change of reclaim mode if unevictable page encountered
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
>
> When I said it needed more justification, I meant that you need to show
> a workload or usecase that suffers as a result of reset_reclaim_mode
> being called here. I explained already that the reset errs on the
> side of caution by making reclaim work less.
>
> You need to describe what problem your workload is suffering from and
> why this patch fixes it.
>
Got and thanks for review /Hillf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists