[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F10BAB0.70308@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:13:52 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
gouders@...bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de,
Marcos Souza <marcos.mage@...il.com>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, justinmattock@...il.com,
Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: x86/mce: machine check warning during poweroff
> Assuming the problem is with the multiple devices (not fully sure):
>
> The redundant devices don't make much sense anyways, they are all
> mirrors of each other
> (state changes always affect all CPUs) Could just collapse down to a
> single device and symlink
> the others.
Checking again it seems like the AMD threshold code reports per CPU
counters so it would
still need per CPU devices.
All the other code is just a single instance I believe and doesn't
actually need all the
complicated per CPU code.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists