linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio-pch: cleanup _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZEZ6X20mtP5reAq2UaG5f0DS_hMBN9L8LpV1O0tBkb-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:01:45 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Németh Márton <nm127@...email.hu>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio-pch: cleanup __iomem annotation usage

2012/1/17 Németh Márton <nm127@...email.hu>:

> Hi Linux,

:-)

Common mistake, as are our brother Kubys who also
appear on the lists sometimes...

> You are right, the correct one should be "void __iomem *im_reg;" .
>
> Should I resend a patch for this?

Yep just send it with subject [PATCH 1/2 v2] atleast
that's what I usually do.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/