[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F1733DF.7040905@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:04:31 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
keescook@...omium.org, john.johansen@...onical.com,
serge.hallyn@...onical.com, coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
pmoore@...hat.com, eparis@...hat.com, djm@...drot.org,
segoon@...nwall.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
scarybeasts@...il.com, avi@...hat.com, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
khilman@...com, borislav.petkov@....com, amwang@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, gregkh@...e.de,
dhowells@...hat.com, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, olofj@...omium.org,
mhalcrow@...gle.com, dlaor@...hat.com,
Roland McGrath <mcgrathr@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?
On 01/18/2012 01:01 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:55 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>
>> If we're going to use bits in an existing register field I would be
>> happier if we used bits [31:16] of CS, which are unlikely to ever be
>> used for anything.
>
> See my note about that: I would have preferred CS or ORIG_AX myself,
> but that breaks existing binaries. So that isn't really an option.
>
Fair enough. Sigh. I still think an actual pseudo-register would be
better.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists