[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120119131854.d1795a461302e72e727e63df@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:18:54 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 (uml)
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:07:24 -0800 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
>
> Building uml on x86_64 gives:
>
> CC arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s
> In file included from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/shared/registers.h:9:0,
> from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/asm/processor-generic.h:14,
> from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/asm/processor.h:20,
> from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/asm/uaccess.h:16,
> from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/asm/thread_info.h:13,
> from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/thread_info.h:53,
> from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/preempt.h:9,
> from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/spinlock.h:50,
> from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/seqlock.h:29,
> from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/time.h:8,
> from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/timex.h:56,
> from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/sched.h:57,
> from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:2,
> from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1:
> /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/ptrace.h:7:20: error: redefinition of 'regs_return_value'
> /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/ptrace.h:7:20: note: previous definition of 'regs_return_value' was here
Caused by commit d7e7528bcd45 ("Audit: push audit success and retcode
into arch ptrace.h") (another patch that was never in linux-next :-().
This file now needs protection against double inclusion.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists