linux-kernel - [RFC] splitting cgroup.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F177C67.6070907@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:13:59 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] splitting cgroup.c

While working on cgroup xattr, it appeared to me it's better to
create a cgroup_xattr.c instead of stuffing things into cgroup.c.

Then I took a look at how big it is.

    $ ls -l -S kernel/*.c
    -rw-rw-r--  1 lizf lizf 142717 Jan 18 10:15 cgroup.c
    -rw-rw-r--  1 lizf lizf 106498 Jan 18 10:15 workqueue.c
    -rw-rw-r--  1 lizf lizf 105206 Jan 18 10:15 lockdep.c
    -rw-rw-r--  1 lizf lizf  91321 Jan 18 10:16 module.c
    
    $ wc -l kernel/*.c | sort -n -r
      90397 total
       5289 cgroup.c
       4206 lockdep.c
       3840 workqueue.c
       3507 module.c

So I think for the sake of readability and maintainability, we'd
better split cgroup.c into smaller pieces:

- event_control.c
- css_id.c
- debug.c
- proc.c
- super.c
...
- cgroup.c

We may add xattr.c and release_agency.c as I'm working on them.

Any objection?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/