[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEMzQTZ5ASCrrDJ6KSe41=yKL+7ayo_LfkZh3vagcopiGAj1tQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 09:18:43 -0800
From: sam hansen <solid.se7en@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@...-net.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xgifb: checkpatch cleanup, printk() KERN_*
> These last two should be KERN_CONT
> though the block could be rewritten as
>
> if (XGIInitNew(pdev))
> printk(KERN_INFO "XGIfb: XGIInitNew() ... OK\n");
> else
> printk(KERN_ERR "XGIfb: XGIInitNew() ... Fail\n");
>
> Emitting any dmesg output like "XGIInitNew() ... OK\n"
> is almost always low value.
>
> Perhaps just emitting on the error case is better:
> if (!XGIInitNew(pdev))
> printk(KERN_ERR "XGIfb: XBIInitNew() failed\n");
Cool. See Re: Dan. I will fold the printk logic up.
> One other thing. It would be better to add
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> before any #include and convert all the
> printks(KERN_<LEVEL> to pr_<level>(
> stripping all the leading XGIfb: too.
I might take a stab at eliminating explicit calls to printk and use a macro.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists