[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEMzQTZZnPfGK4CZGw+PraL59f4C8eADfvpaGUrVd38d5TFA+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:22:38 -0800
From: sam hansen <solid.se7en@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@...-net.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xgifb: checkpatch cleanup, printk() KERN_*
> One other thing. It would be better to add
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> before any #include and convert all the
> printks(KERN_<LEVEL> to pr_<level>(
> stripping all the leading XGIfb: too.
So, an administrative question. Sorry for my noob-ishness but... I
will be 1) modifying the patch regarding prink to use pr_LVL (and a
few logic tweaks), and will also be introducing a new patch to set up
the pr_fmt macro for kbuild. I can find lots of information regarding
how to create/submit a patch, but not a lot of information about how
to modify/resubmit a patch you've already submitted and received
feedback for.
The pr_fmt patch will likely just be a new patch outside of this patch
set? Or should I use git-rebase to work it in the middle of the patch
set and regenerate/resend all patches (this approach doesn't seem to
make sense).
I'm not sure how the git commit short-hashes work with the patches,
and I don't want to destroy that information because it seems like
it's important when stuff goes upstream?
Thanks for any feedback you guys may have :)
And thanks for helping me pull myself up to actually being useful to you all.
~s
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists