linux-kernel - Re: recvmsg sleeping from invalid context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201201222031.51116.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:31:51 +0100
From:	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	davej@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: recvmsg sleeping from invalid context

On niedziela, 22 stycznia 2012 o 20:10:06 David Miller wrote:
> From: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>
> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:54:59 +0100
> 
> > I created a Bugzilla entry at
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42629
> > for your bug report, please add your address to the CC list in there,
> > thanks!
> 
> Please don't do this, none of the networking developers use bugzilla,
> we keep the discussion and analysis going here on netdev.

These entries are using for tracking regressions, for *all* kernel parts, 
without any exception. I see no reason to treat someone differently. If netdev 
provides any interface to tracking regressions, then show me it. But then why 
you do not use one common tool for all kernel?

Regards
-- 
Maciej Rutecki
http://www.mrutecki.pl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/