linux-kernel - Re: recvmsg sleeping from invalid context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120122.143728.1710688129934394279.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:37:28 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	maciej.rutecki@...il.com
Cc:	davej@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: recvmsg sleeping from invalid context

From: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:31:51 +0100

> These entries are using for tracking regressions, for *all* kernel parts, 
> without any exception. I see no reason to treat someone differently. If netdev 
> provides any interface to tracking regressions, then show me it. But then why 
> you do not use one common tool for all kernel?

This mailing list is the tracking mechanism.

You can create whatever you want, but I can guarentee that the very
people who can actually move the bug forward and fix the problem will
look at it.

It's been like this for ages, Andrew Morton understands how we wish
to track bugs, and that we don't want to use bugzilla for that purpose.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/