linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (nfs tree related)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1327342224.2628.3.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:10:24 -0500
From:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (nfs
 tree related)

On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 13:59 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: 
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c: In function 'svc_setup_socket':
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:1412:40: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_net'
> 
> This build has CONFIG_NET_NS unset.
> 
> Caused by commit eff9c3383687 ("SUNRPC: pass network namespace to service
> registering routines").
> 
> I applied this (suboptimal) patch for today:
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:55:01 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] SUNRPC: fixup for namespace changes
> 
> Fixes this build error when CONFIG_NET_NS is not set:
> 
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c: In function 'svc_setup_socket':
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:1412:40: error: 'struct sock_common' has no member named 'skc_net'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  net/sunrpc/svcsock.c |    9 ++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> index e8af0c9..4d02d1a 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
>  #include <net/ipv6.h>
>  #include <net/tcp.h>
>  #include <net/tcp_states.h>
> +#include <net/net_namespace.h>
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  #include <asm/ioctls.h>
>  
> @@ -1409,7 +1410,13 @@ static struct svc_sock *svc_setup_socket(struct svc_serv *serv,
>  
>  	/* Register socket with portmapper */
>  	if (*errp >= 0 && pmap_register)
> -		*errp = svc_register(serv, sock->sk->sk_net, inet->sk_family,
> +		*errp = svc_register(serv,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
> +				     sock->sk->sk_net,
> +#else
> +				     &init_net,
> +#endif
> +				     inet->sk_family,
>  				     inet->sk_protocol,
>  				     ntohs(inet_sk(inet)->inet_sport));
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.9.rc0.23.g7e521

Stanislav,

Shouldn't we just be using a 'sock_net(sock->sk)'?

Cheers
  Trond

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
www.netapp.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/