linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM: Remove the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:15:31 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM: Remove the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
 definition

On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 17:42 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is version 3 of the set of patches removing
> __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on ARM. The series was rebased on top of
> 3.3-rc1 and fixed the conflicts with the kernel/sched/ changes and the
> ARM LPAE patches. There are no functional changes from v2. I plan to
> push this to -next and get it ready for 3.4-rc1.
> 
> Question for Peter/Ingo - how do we merge the first patch that
> introduces finish_arch_post_lock_switch? Do you pick it up or I can
> merge it via rmk (with your ack)?

I'm fine either way, I'll probably ask Ingo to pull your tree so that I
can stack some other patches on top.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/