[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120123092624.GA11983@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:26:24 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM: Remove the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
definition
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:15:31AM +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 17:42 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > This is version 3 of the set of patches removing
> > __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on ARM. The series was rebased on top of
> > 3.3-rc1 and fixed the conflicts with the kernel/sched/ changes and the
> > ARM LPAE patches. There are no functional changes from v2. I plan to
> > push this to -next and get it ready for 3.4-rc1.
> >
> > Question for Peter/Ingo - how do we merge the first patch that
> > introduces finish_arch_post_lock_switch? Do you pick it up or I can
> > merge it via rmk (with your ack)?
>
> I'm fine either way, I'll probably ask Ingo to pull your tree so that I
> can stack some other patches on top.
In which case I would need Russell's acked-by.
Thanks.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists