linux-kernel - Re: /etc/fstab.d yes or not

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:19:24 +0200
From:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
CC:	Masatake YAMATO <yamato@...hat.com>, <kzak@...hat.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<util-linux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: /etc/fstab.d yes or not

On 01/20/2012 04:56 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> 
> It's an old glibc API, and /etc/fstab is ABI, not a service config
> file, which now can read more than one file. It's a very different
> problem. It an ABI change, not a config extension.
> 

Can't we have our cake and eat it too?

I mean why not have both?

The subsystem that you currently plan to parse the /etc/fstab.d/ will
intelligently  add the /etc/fstab.d/ entries to /etc/fstab before
actually processing and mounting /etc/fstab.

So the rpm guys have their /etc/fstab.d/ convenience and the rest
of the  ABI is kept intact. (If you can't bit them join them)

Since /etc/fstab is hand edited as well. There are lots of smart
things that can be done like a remark (#) marker at the end of the
file that all /etc/fstab.d/ entries get to be added after. (And
a comment for the user) and some smart duplicate removal of, and
so on ... Even a marker per line added.

Just my $0,017
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/