[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120124010602.GA27017@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:06:02 -0500
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Roger Leigh <rleigh@...elibre.net>,
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, util-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /etc/fstab.d yes or not
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:07:20PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> So with a good coding hat on - please don't consider fstab API, it's got
> a programming interface 8). Otherwise I agree fstab.d is wrong.
>
It has a programming interface for reading, but other programs can do
modify (and read) the file directly. If some joker decided to change
the formatting of /etc/fstab from tab-delimeted to some crazy XML
encoding, I am certain things would break.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists