lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1327508186-26704-1-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:16:24 -0800
From:	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
To:	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Use correct bpc computations for DisplayPort

Here's a couple of patches that fix some bpc (bits per component)
computation issues with DisplayPort. The problem was that the
DisplayPort code tried to figure out the 'current' bpc by looking at
the bpp stored in an associated crtc, but that was never right (as
described in the message for the first patch).

The first patch assumes that the display will run at 8bpc (24bpp) if
the link has enough bandwidth, otherwise at 6bpc (18bpp). This is
essentially what the existing code ends up doing at boot time; modes
are computed before any crtc is assigned, so intel_dp_link_required
would have used 24bpp for bandwidth computations.

The second patch allows for arbitrary bpc values, computing the
display bpc in both intel_dp_mode_fixup and the two crtc_mode_set
functions. Obviously doing the computation once would be nice, but
there isn't an obvious place to stick the result between those two
functions as the bpc computation is also needed for non-DP encoders.

This should fix problems where display port doesn't come back after
resume for panels which need 6bpc modes.

--
keith.packard@...el.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ