linux-kernel - Re: + kmod-avoid-deadlock-by-recursive-kmod-call.patch added to -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120126175612.GA24011@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:56:12 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + kmod-avoid-deadlock-by-recursive-kmod-call.patch added to
	-mm tree

> @@ -449,6 +460,16 @@ int call_usermodehelper_exec(struct subp
>  		retval = -EBUSY;
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> +	/*
> +	 * Worker thread must not wait for khelper thread at below
> +	 * wait_for_completion() if the thread was created with CLONE_VFORK
> +	 * flag, for khelper thread is already waiting for the thread at
> +	 * wait_for_completion() in do_fork().
> +	 */
> +	if (wait != UMH_NO_WAIT && current == kmod_thread_locker) {
> +		retval = -EBUSY;
> +		goto out;
> +	}

So, this is because khelper_wq's max_active == 1.

Can't we simply kill khelper_wq and use system_unbound_wq instead?

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/