[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120126184438.GA25629@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:44:38 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
keescook@...omium.org, john.johansen@...onical.com,
serge.hallyn@...onical.com, coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
pmoore@...hat.com, eparis@...hat.com, djm@...drot.org,
segoon@...nwall.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
scarybeasts@...il.com, avi@...hat.com, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
khilman@...com, borislav.petkov@....com, amwang@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, gregkh@...e.de,
dhowells@...hat.com, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, olofj@...omium.org,
mhalcrow@...gle.com, dlaor@...hat.com,
Roland McGrath <mcgrathr@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?
On 01/26, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 20:36, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > We can add the new events,
> >
> > PTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL_ENTRY
> > PTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL_COMPAT_ENTRY
> > PTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL_EXIT
> > PTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL_COMPAT_EXIT
>
> We can get away with just the first one.
> (1) It's unlikely people would want to get native sysentry events but not compat ones,
> thus first two options can be combined into one;
Confused... Sure, we need the single option, or we could even report
this unconditionally if PT_SEIZED.
I meant the different PTRACE_EVENT_* codes only.
> (2) syscall exit compat-ness is known from entry type - no need to indicate it; and
> (3) if we would flag syscall entry with an event value in wait status, then syscall
> exit will be already distinquisable.
Well, if we add _ENTRY then it looks more consistent to report _EXIT
as well even if it is not that useful.
Doesn't matter. Nobody seem to like this, and afaics Linus has the
good arguments against the arch-independent "consolidation".
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists