[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120126.170204.2031178865806155061.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:02:04 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com
Subject: Re: sparc32 vs lib/mpi
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:12:43 +0000
> I realize that very few people care about sparc32 these days,
> but...
> a) __clz_tab[] is defined (with identical contents) in
> lib/mpi/mpi-bit.c and arch/sparc/lib/divdi3.S. Linker is unhappy,
> of course...
> b) the same thing ends up using __udiv_qrnnd(), which simply
> does not exist on sparc32. There's a Cthulhu-scaring cascade of
> ifdefs in lib/mpi/longlong.h, with several variants of udiv_qrnnd()
> for sparc. Unfortunately, it falls back on use of __udiv_qrnnd()...
> Note that arch/sparc/math-emu/sfp-util_32.h has a definition of
> udiv_qrnnd() which might match one of inline assembly variants in
> lib/mpi/longlong.h. Or not. BTW, what the hell is LONGLONG_STANDALONE?
>
> Could somebody who might remember still remember that stuff
> come up with comments? For now I'm disabling everything from
> INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE down to MPILIB on sparc32 cross-build, but it
> would be nice to get it at least somewhat sorted out...
I'm taking a look at this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists