[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120128105246.GA25092@elgon.mountain>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:52:46 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
x86@...nel.org, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] x86, dumpstack: removed unneeded check in dump_trace()
Smatch complains that we have some inconsistent NULL checking. If
"task" were NULL then it would lead to a NULL dereference later. We
can remove this test because earlier on in the function we have:
if (!task)
task = current;
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
index 6d728d9..af7785f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
if (!stack) {
if (regs)
stack = (unsigned long *)regs->sp;
- else if (task && task != current)
+ else if (task != current)
stack = (unsigned long *)task->thread.sp;
else
stack = &dummy;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists