[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120130055459.GJ17211@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:54:59 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: add missing block_bio_complete() tracepoint
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 02:51:43PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012-01-30 11:53 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:49:43 AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >>Yes, blktrace will see both of completions for rq and bio's it
> >>contains from now on, and I thought it's your intention? For the
> >>bounced bio's, it'll see one more completion per bio.
> >
> >Umm... no, blktrace users shouldn't see confusing outputs. My point
> >was that we should leave raw tracepoints as raw monitor points so that
> >they can provide raw data to different users and filter from
> >blktrace.c so that the existing users aren't disturbed.
> >
>
> That means blktrace should not be changed, and not see duplicated
> completions for rq based drivers at all?
Yeap
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists