linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracing/module: Move tracepoint out of module.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87sjiwjzew.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:28:47 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracing/module: Move tracepoint out of module.h

On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 06:52:13 -0500, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 13:32 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:39:46 +0100, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > > Ok, i like this one best. Rusty, does it look good to you too?
> > 
> > No, the if (module) test belongs in the inline wrapper (since gcc knows
> > that at compile time).
> 
> For some reason though it still adds 5K when we keep the code as a
> static inline. Note, my test config does have all the necessary modules
> to boot the box as compiled in (not as modules). If necessary, I could
> compile with a distro config and see what the differences are with that.
> 
> Rusty, the final decision is yours. If you believe that the added code
> size is worth having the static inlines, then I'll go back to the
> previous version that had that.

Wow, we're really bikeshedding this!

I was completely wrong with the "it's usually a constant" of course;
it's usually ->owner.

So let's just out-of-line the entire thing.  I changed the type to bool
and s/_THIS_IP_/_RET_IP_/ -- is that sufficient?

Doesn't save me much here, though.  What are your stats?


module: move __module_get and try_module_get() out of line.

With the preempt, tracepoint and everything, it's getting a bit
chubby.

Saves only 400 bytes of text here, but I don't do preempt or
tracepoints.

Before:
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
5373459	 399532	2514944	8287935	 7e76bf	vmlinux

After:
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
5373071	 399532	2514944	8287547	 7e753b	vmlinux

diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
--- a/include/linux/module.h
+++ b/include/linux/module.h
@@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <asm/module.h>
 
-#include <trace/events/module.h>
-
 /* Not Yet Implemented */
 #define MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE(name)
 
@@ -452,33 +450,11 @@ void symbol_put_addr(void *addr);
 
 /* Sometimes we know we already have a refcount, and it's easier not
    to handle the error case (which only happens with rmmod --wait). */
-static inline void __module_get(struct module *module)
-{
-	if (module) {
-		preempt_disable();
-		__this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->incs);
-		trace_module_get(module, _THIS_IP_);
-		preempt_enable();
-	}
-}
+extern void __module_get(struct module *module);
 
-static inline int try_module_get(struct module *module)
-{
-	int ret = 1;
-
-	if (module) {
-		preempt_disable();
-
-		if (likely(module_is_live(module))) {
-			__this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->incs);
-			trace_module_get(module, _THIS_IP_);
-		} else
-			ret = 0;
-
-		preempt_enable();
-	}
-	return ret;
-}
+/* This is the Right Way to get a module: if it fails, it's being removed,
+ * so pretend it's not there. */
+extern bool try_module_get(struct module *module);
 
 extern void module_put(struct module *module);
 
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -903,6 +903,36 @@ static ssize_t show_refcnt(struct module
 static struct module_attribute modinfo_refcnt =
 	__ATTR(refcnt, 0444, show_refcnt, NULL);
 
+void __module_get(struct module *module)
+{
+	if (module) {
+		preempt_disable();
+		__this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->incs);
+		trace_module_get(module, _RET_IP_);
+		preempt_enable();
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__module_get);
+
+bool try_module_get(struct module *module)
+{
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	if (module) {
+		preempt_disable();
+
+		if (likely(module_is_live(module))) {
+			__this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->incs);
+			trace_module_get(module, _RET_IP_);
+		} else
+			ret = false;
+
+		preempt_enable();
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_module_get);
+
 void module_put(struct module *module)
 {
 	if (module) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/